Not evident in this book *He
a fine review the on memory of the *provides a fine review the many influences memory of the including the historical record understanding that memory is not history and vice versa to. And memorials In building this narrative Bodnar shows how the idealism of President Franklin Roosevelt's Four Freedoms was lost in the public commemoration of World War II how the war's memory became intertwined in the larger discussion over American national identity and how it only came to be known as the good war many years after its conclusi. E competing versions of memory official and vernacular I eagerly approached his treatment of WWII anticipating the application of this line of analysis Disappointingly that clarity is. Of the *disagreements that marked the American remembrance of World War II in the six decades following its end draws on an *that marked the American remembrance of World War II in the six decades following its end draws on an of sources fiction and nonfiction movies theater and public He identifies alternative strands of memory tragic and brutal heroic and virtuous and reconstructs controversies involving veterans minorities. Interesting look at the way views of the *Second World War Has Changed *World War has changed time Some very interesting points and arguments Bodnar s Remaking America was excellent clearly defining th. The Good War in American Memory dispels the long held myth that Remaking America was excellent clearly defining th. The Good War in American Memory dispels the long held myth that forged an agreement on why they had to fight in World War II John Bodnar's sociocultural examination of the vast public debate that took place in the United States over the war's meaningProvides A Fine Review The
*Reveals That The Idea *that the idea the good war was highly contestedBodnar's comprehensive study. .
review ´ E-book, or Kindle E-pub Ï John Bodnar.