Glen Yeadon Ã 9 DownloadRlands Norway Poland Yugoslavia and the French National Committee Also present as observers were the United States Britain the Soviet Union China the Dominions and India Eden addressed the group with caution concluding that the governments of occupied territories should take the initiative in declaring the principles by which they will be guided once liberatedF nny did they not ealise that India the Dominions and even US for that matter were then occupied territories Which except for India still are Or do they euate the natives to zero which is what nazis did without subterfuge of giving them other false namesTwo of the biggest stumbling blocks between Britain and the Soviets were the case of Rudolf Hess and the inclusion of the Dominions The Soviets wanted immediate trials including that of Hess the British wanted to wait until after the war before beginning any trials The British also wanted to include the Dominions such as New Zealand and South Africa on the commission The Soviets opposed including the Dominions unless each of the Soviet states eceived eual status This also was a bedrock issue for the Soviets in forming the present United Nations By demanding the Dominions each have a separate vote British influence
Was Multiplied Several Fold Denyingmultiplied several fold denying Soviet demand for a vote for each of its states weakened its overall influenceNotice Brits demanding a a vote for each of its states weakened its overall influenceNotice Brits demanding a for dominions translated lands stolen completely from natives citizens mostly European migrants with negligible ignored dominated and pushed into corners natives but India the Jewel In The Crown indeed the land where jewels food and most of Brit wealth was sourced from by looting India wasn t to have a place and yet the whole eason for the ivalry animosity and suspicion from UK towards USSR was lest India be free and Russia close neighbour be able to influence IndiaHow overt the acismOn Oct 20 1943 epresentatives from 17 nations met in London to inaugurate the UNWCC The Soviets were absent The Dutch epresentative disagreed with the British view which limited the commission to investigating and ecording evidence of war crimes The Dutch proposed the commission be actively involved in preparing the trials The Chinese epresentative aised another troublesome point for the British They wanted to include all war crimes dating back to the Japanese invasion of Manchuria in 1931 The British feared granting this euest would open the door for the Czechs to demand investigations back to the Munich agreement in which the British ole was less than exemplary Beyond a vote to set up the commission and the headuarters location nothing substantial was accomplishedIndeed British government could be indicted and convicted for stealing harvest from India and being so callous about esulting death of millions in India as to disallow aid ships of grain sent by FDR to proceed further after they arrived at Australia Churchill was explicit in stating that India starving to death was not worthy of a thoughtOn Nov 1 the Big Three signed the Moscow Declaration on prosecuting war criminals The document ended with the following wordsLet those who have hitherto not imbrued their hands with innocent blood beware lest they join the anks of the guilty for most assuredly the Allied Powers will pursue them to the uttermost ends of the earth and will deliver them to their accusers in order that justice may be done The above declaration is without prejudice to the case of major criminals whose offences have no particular geographical localization and who will be punished by the joint decision of the Governments of the AlliesAgain extremely interesting when they signed it was humanity considered limited to totally European ancestryIn mid July 1943 the Soviet Union put 11 of its citizens on trial for high treason for aiding the German forces around the town of Krasnodar and for their ole in helping annihilate 7000 people Eight Soviets were sentenced to hang the emaining defendants were deported or sentenced to 20 years of hard labor Moscow obviously wished to prove its commitment to punishing war criminals and to a joint policy The Soviets held many German POWs including many believed to be guilty of war crimesSeveral after the hangings Soviet scholar Professor A Farrin published an English version of War and the Working Class This hinted at being the official viewpoint of the Soviet Union The article divided war criminals into four classes The first class included Hitler and his cabinet ministers The second class included party leaders and the German Army Command Financial and industrial leaders made up the third class The fourth group was defined as those who benefited from the Nazi plundering such as by eceiving stolen goods or exploiting slave laborHmmmmmmmm That last does fit Brits. E family name stands above all others Spanning over 90 years and 4 generations the Bush family has chosen to ally themselves with Nazism and warmongering at home and abroad ever willing to advance the Nazi agenda of global corporati. ,
Lly heart of the work definition of fascism in his first chapter He provides several by various people including Webster s dictionary Many of the characteristics apply almost completely to most colonial empires or any egimes established by invaders where the locals or natives were treated at far less than par with the invaders This includes a l empires established by migrants from Europe but also those by Mongols and othersMost of them he either does not say or plain forgets would fit Roman empire and it s successor church especially the inuisitionBut to the point he identifies nationalism as essential characteristic of fascism This is a common mistake due to the word nationalism being usurped and twisted into fraud by Nazi ideology with which it s identified This is as huge a mistake as allowing the Nazi fraudulent usage And False Interpretation Of Ancient Indian Terms And Symbols The false interpretation of ancient Indian terms and symbols the Aryan and the symbol SwastikaLove of nation does not euate with destruction of other nations or aces by attacking them and taking their lands while educing their people to slavery or worse causing them to perish in millions Before nazis did that few could point at them as much wrongIndeed most indicative of what nazis did wrong was Kristallnacht not the flagwaving or the assertion of German supremacy Everyone is free to love ones nation as everyone is free to love one s own home and family and to claim that one s own are the best The trouble only begins when there is an assault against others with a demand to have them agreeThe most characteristic of fascism is the image of Mussolini s thugs beating up opposition leaders including women with truncheons to death Matteotti and Barbara Pugliese to name two It wasn t about loving ItalyAnd no leader loving one s nation would give the orders to call young boys teenagers and even younger to fight the war and destroy all fields factories and infrastructure ather than surrender just for egotistical easons of not wanting personal humiliation Nazis were definitely not about loving Germany They knew Germans did not want war before they went to war anywayFascism is evil pure and simple It s about death and destruction of all civilisation and slavery of others to ones own It has nothing to do with love Of anyoneThe second chapter uotes so many cases of corporate bad behaviour including that of hospitals that one is eminded of The Brass Check by Upton Sinclair with a halfway certainty that he would ve
Seen This Work Asthis work as by someone much younger At this time the party changed its name to National Socialist German Workers Party Hitler also insisted on a party flag that could outdo the communist banner A dentist from Stamberg suggested the design The swastika has a long history dating back centuries and is found in various cultures including American Indians It had long been a symbol of the Teutonic Knights and was used by the Thule Society and several Freikorp unitsThat points at double acism by the author one denying oots of the symbol in India the very word Swastik or Swastika is of Sanskrit language of ancient India and literally means Symbol of Well being it s an occult symbol and it s misuse backfired on nazis and on Germany in India it s in everyday use since antiuity till date painted or drawn fresh before homes by women early in morning every day invoking blessings on the household and two promoting the lie of nomenclature by calling natives of his continent Indian although by now it ought to be clear to everyone they have have never had anything to do with India although the latest theory in West is that they were migrants from Mongolia and Siberia who walked across the Bering straitThis promotion of a lie by Columbus serves to annihilate India and her still living flourishing culture the annihilation being convenient for every invader culture and every colonial egime euating all subjugated people of earth under the epithet IndianThis is a much humongous lie compared to the original one by Columbus because India is a name given by outsiders specifically by West to the land The name elates to the iver Sindhu called Indus by West as usual deforming words they can t pronounce because that crossing was the only entry for them to the land protected by Himaalayan anges and oceans on every other sideIndia is named differently in India and always was since the iver Sindhu wasn t identified by those within India with than the small province that was the mouth of the iver Its one of the major ivers of India but not amongst the first five only about sixth or so None of the Indian names for India elate to the iver Sindhu in any wayExtremely interesting The meeting of the Allies took place on Jan 13 1942 Representatives from nine nations took part Belgium Czechoslovakia Greece Luxembourg the Nethe. T on the home front to the same cadre of American elitists who built Hitler's war machine At the center of this small confederacy two firms stand out Brown Brothers Harriman and Sullivan Cromwell At the very eye of this oligarchy on. .
MasterfulA very thorough analysis of the Western fascination with fascism and the fear of Communism in any form Combines many previous studies in one volume This was written and published about 2006 when the concerns expressed herein were those of many felt not by just the one author about the direction of his nationMuch has happened since including change of leadership not just of the person in office but the party too Election esults of 2008 were a huge celebration and with good eason despite the subseuent behaviour of most politicians that eflected their deeply ooted acism That was esponsible too than most other factors for another change of leadership in a direction supposedly surprising to mediaThose deriding the last and current leader in office have either forgotten the first few years of the millennium and the concerns expressed here by the author or are simply those that would not accept someone not a member of the club But the very open derogation of the current leader in office is completely opposite of the then atmosphere where criticism was limited to a comedian on television spoofing hilarious pronunciation of a word here and there Some of those mispronounced words have since become standard in US by people one expects better from such was the then lack of spine in opposition to the leader in office when this was publishedMost people overlook the fact that the esults of 2000 election were not genuine but manipulated on the other hand esults of 2016 eflect eality of the mindset of US if not majority of voters then at least as natural outcome of the electoral college style of US elections Any faults eflected in the esult are merely deeply entrenched in the psyche if not of most voters than of most living in most of the country A spate of murders began after 2008 and the country wasn t going to tolerate a woman leader despite thereby being behind over a dozen nations of the world including some first world and some never so consideredThis backward state of psyche is not
surprising to anyone familiar with bible belt insistingto anyone familiar with bible belt insisting internet
About Earth Being Flat More Relevant It Shouldn T Beearth being flat More elevant it shouldn t be if one eally eflects on easons why until 2008 but most elevantly during early years of the new millennium a nation leading the world in supposedly fighting terror was friends with another that s Benn proven over and over the decades since it s inception a terrorist factory This friendship was not new but was begun for sake of a cover for military bases for west for use against USSR and continued subseuently for the eal easons that have to do with the bible belt psychologically than anything else With the help of Anglo Saxon clubs the 1924 Virginia legislator passed the Racial Integrity Act labeling anyone with than one sixteenth nonwhite blood as a nonwhite Originally the act called for one sixty fourth but the legislature amended it because too many of the leading families of Virginia boasted of their Indian ancestry The penalty for falsely egistering one s ace was a year in jailHere s yet another acist colonial perpetration of a falsehood by Columbus who knew he d not found India but lied Perpetrating that lie knowing that natives of US have nothing to do with India and still calling them Indian is acist based on a subliminal assumption that all colonial invaders are superior and natives of such lands do not matter no matter how ancient their culture how ich the treasure of their ancient knowledge It s a falsehood on par with say Mongol invaders calling Europe Afghanistan Yet the latter is less fraudulent than the author calling natives of his continent IndianIndia was a name given by outsiders in West to the ancient land that was India because crossing the iver Sindhu name deformed to Indus by West was their only access to this land for millennia India had other names for the land The iver Sindhu had never been of paramount importance to those that belonged to India And they were the eal Aarya unlike European thieves who stole and appropriated the term for themselvesAarya is a Sanskrit word and
has nothing to do with physical colours Land of Aarya is a translation of one of the indigenous names fornothing to do with physical colours Land of Aarya is a translation of one of the indigenous names for The uintessential Aarya was Raamaayana hero who s described for his perfect beauty specifically as dark hued Another much worshipped God Shiva is described as literally Camphor light hued so light colours have never been unfamiliar either They just are neither here nor there when implications of ualities even beauty are in uestion And no such people as Plecker never could ualify as Aarya any than a Nazi could for the word elates to Light and connotes someone with a level of enlightenment incorporated in ones breeding as in being brought upThe author discusses after the introduction chapter which is ea. Provocative and highly controversial The Nazi Hydra In America presents an overview of the fascist influence in America While Eisenhower's troops defeated The Third Reich on the battlefields of Europe the war against fascism was los. ,