Free Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation (Chicago Studies in Practices of Meaning) – thetributepages.co.uk
A very useful book for social science students to get the sense of historians and history students to know the utility of developing conceptual tools The first chapter the sense of historians and history students to know the utility of developing conceptual tools The first chapter espcially interesting as the author traced his own intellectual career and related it not only to shifts of academic paradigmns but also to structural changes in our contempoary world in which the academias are situated Later chapters go deep in to methodological issues grounded in his detailed presentation of the writings of the French Revolution Geertz and Sahlins surely inspired his ideas in a great deal as Sewell was able to practice Geertz s insight of meanings as public and Sahlins s of the dialectical relationship between structure and event in very concrete historical studies His style is clear his conceptual awareness and his knowledge of the implicit and explict assumptions in a handful of disciplines simply guides the reader through an enterprise which would have ooked formidable Despite a healthy degree of repetition and reinforcement this collection of essays presents so many discrete concepts and arguments about historiography that it is often uite challenging but always invigorating simply to begin to assimilate its ideas as guides for the writing of history Yet so than most theoretical works Sewell clearly intends his work as an aid for historians who struggle with the conceptual thinness of many core practices in the field who would ike to reground their own research and writing on solider ground than convention and piecemeal poaching from other disciplines Sewell s great advantage in this task is in fact his ability to articulate a common conceptual grammar buried deep beneath the jargon of the interpretive social sciences to demonstrate how anthropology sociology and history can and have be of mutual aid because they connect at crucial but freuently obscured theoretical maybe even metaphysical points Of great and I would expect Verdammt verliebt lasting value I am all about chapters 7 8 and 9 in this book The others are reasonably compelling but theyack the historical context that make 7 8 and 9 so fascinating In chapter 7 he analyzes Marshall Sahlin s Possible Theory of History in the context of Sahlin s work on Captain Cook s ill fated trip to Hawaii There is probably no better example of being in the wrong place at the wrong time which means that Sahlin has a great appreciation for historical contingency and human agency Chapter 8 deals with one of Sewell s specialties the storming of the Bastille Sewell makes a compelling argument about how Bastille Day s prominence in the story of the French Revolution was not accidental nor was it inevitable Chapter 9
explores historical duration and temporal complexity through the changing fortunes of dockworkers in historical duration and temporal complexity through the changing fortunes of dockworkers in I feel The Way Between the Worlds (The View from the Mirror, like these chapters are easy to get sucked into and are convincing than those which present naked theory aloneIt was also interesting to find out after reading the book that the essays are not in their original order In a way the whole book made sense when I realized that the. While social scientists and historians have been exchanging ideas for aong time they have never developed a proper dialogue about social theory William H Sewell Jr observes that on uestions of theory the communication has been mostly one way from social science to history Logics of History argues that both history and the social sciences have something crucial to offer each other While his. Reason certain things felt helter skelter was that they were decades apart in time Stimulating and argely persuasive Recommended to all my fellow history students particularly those doing social or cultural work which my fellow history students particularly those doing social or cultural work which to
say recommended to everybody who knows what s good for youSewell s goal is to bring historians recommended to everybody who knows what s good for youSewell s goal is to bring historians social scientists together He argues that each of these groups has a useful theoretical contribution to make to the other Too often however historians either neglect theory or copy it unmodified from the other disciplines into their own writing The result in a work of history is to impoverish either the generally static account of social context or the dynamic narrative of events respectively At the same time historians generally fail to a This is an excellent book and very readable as The Good and Beautiful God long as you are familiar with the concepts involved Sewell manages to make an impressively viable argument for incorporating useful aspects of the heavily structuralist social history into the contemporary cultural turn This kind of argument for synthesis and moderation in theory is too rare and refreshing to see This is a book of theory Sewell writes about his experience as a historian and evaluates the various approaches to history that he has been involved with Starting as a social historian using numerical methods to write about those without a voice he moved into cultural history which meantooking at texts for the meaning they shed on events He thinks that the social sciences have much to teach historians but he also argues here for what historians have to teach social scientists interested in history This is not an easy book to read but if you want to think about history and not just consume narratives this is a good place to start This book is a compilation of a series of essays which Sewell wrote over the course of many years In it he argues that historians and social scientists can gain insight from each other Historians bring an understanding of change over time to the table while social scientists bring a robust focus on societal structures The first few chapters read ike an autobiography Sewell uses his own experience during the 1960s and 70s as he experiences the social and cultural turns in historiography He relates these turns with the economical and political environments at those times This use of himself as a primary source has me caught between thinking of him as very arrogant for considering his experience worthy of extrapolation and very humble for displaying his strugglesIn the remaining chapters he provides examples for how the cross talk between historians and social scientists might ookWhile the concepts and terminology in theory are valuable this book is difficult to read He takes a ot of discussion to get to the point Don t expect a cohesive book rather read each chapter as a separate essay which contributes to the overall argument An unexpectedly good book on social theory by a Marxist social historian who justly won the ASA Theory Prize for Outstanding Book in 2008 with his work If yo. Torians do not think of themselves as theorists they know something social scientists do not how to think about the temporalities of social ife On the other hand while social scientists’ treatments of temporality are usually clumsy their theoretical sophistication and penchant for structural accounts of social ife could offer much to historiansRenowned for his work at the crossroads of ,
free download Â eBook or Kindle ePUB ç William H. Sewell Jr.,
Ur research involves a historical dimension but you are not sure how to integrate the historical narrative into social scientific analysis you should check it outThe book is a collection of articles repurposed to form a consistent w This is fundamentally a book
attempts to critiue the nomothetic and mechanistic assumptions of the social sciences from a hermeneutic perspective at the same time asking historians to be theoretically explicit about how they think about from a hermeneutic perspective at the same time asking historians to be theoretically explicit about how they think about He calls for dialog between historians and social scientists identifying social scientists who do social theory or ualitativethat attempts to critiue the nomothetic and mechanistic assumptions of the social sciences from a hermeneutic perspective
Methodologists As The Mostas the most potential interlocutors Social scientists most theoretically valuable habit of mind in my opinion is their strong penchant for structural thinking social scientists tend to ook for explanations in terms of a relatively imited set of enduring entrenched and causally powerful features of the social world Structural thinking is a social scientific virtue that historians could profitably emulate 14Specifically Sewell develops a complex recursive reflexive theory of social structure and how contingent and path dependent events are constantly both reinforcing and at at times remaking those structures It is an attempt in short to recuperate what the Annales School of historiography dismissed as histoire evenementielle eg the mere recounting of what happened In the end he attempts to recuperate the much maligned concept of the social by reconstituting it as overlapping and interconnected streams of semiotic practices 21 Most historians actually share a set of assumptions about how time is implicated in the organization and transformation of social relations These assumptions can be stated abstractly We believe that time is fateful that every act is part of a seuence of actions and that its effects are profoundly dependent upon its place in the seuence that the outcome of action event or trend is ikely to be contingent that its effects will depend upon the particular complex temporal seuence of w This book puts into theoretical form what Sewell takes good mainsteam history social science practice to be With this book you get it all the history of the disciplineconfession social cultural history Fordism post Fordism working definitions of culture structure event and the social a healthy dose of materialism to succor those of us who have survived the Every Boys Dream linguistic turn a re arming of Heroes Giddens Bourdieu Geertz and Sahlins and a cogent defense of the necessity of thinking through synchronicity and diachronicity simultaneouslyI buy it so completely I haven t had time to sit down to think about where I might disagree More valuable than this I find Sewell an exceptionally clear writer I think this book has aot to teach about how to think and write theory and historyAnd even valuable than this I Starflight Zero like Sewell s attitude toward other disciplines and historians we shall critiue and share with each other Sewell is a builder a kindly force for the good of mankind and the workers I am convinced. Istory sociology political science and anthropology Sewell argues that only by combining a sophisticated understanding of historical time with a concern forarger theoretical uestions can a satisfying social theory emerge In Logics of History he reveals the shape such an engagement could take some of the topics it could illuminate and how it might affect both sides of the disciplinary divid.